Iran reportedly to seek to alter nuclear plan
Tehran
will ask this week for 'important adjustments' to the proposal by the
West that Iran send most of its uranium stockpile abroad for enrichment
and eventual return, state-owned TV says.
By Borzou Daragahi
October 28, 2009
Reporting from Beirut
Iran
will seek to amend a proposed deal it reached with the U.S. and other
major powers to ship the bulk of its nuclear material overseas, state
television reported Tuesday.
Tehran will respond by Thursday to
the plan for it to transfer most of its nuclear stockpile to Russia and
France to be turned into fuel for an Iranian medical reactor, but its
counteroffer will include "important adjustments," said Iran's
state-controlled Al Alam, citing unnamed sources.
The
Arabic-language television news channel often broadcasts official news
or floats trial balloons before other state-controlled networks.
The
U.S., Russia, France and the International Atomic Energy Agency, or
IAEA, last week signed off on the proposal to transport the bulk of
Iran's enriched uranium to Russia and France to be further refined and
shaped into fuel plates for the medical reactor, which produces
isotopes for cancer diagnoses and treatment.
While the proposed
deal would not fully allay international concerns about Iran's nuclear
ambitions, it would temporarily reduce the country's stockpile and
dampen fears that Tehran could suddenly break out of treaty obligations
and make a quick sprint toward developing a nuclear weapon. And
diplomats said the deal could also lay the groundwork for broader
negotiations.
But Iran watchers said they expected Tehran to
try to negotiate hard over the quantity of enriched uranium sent abroad
and the shipments' timing in order to gain maximum advantage and ease
hard-liners' mistrustful of any deal with the West.
"My
experience in dealing with a lot of these guys is they won't give up
anything until they absolutely have to," said Mark Fowler, a former CIA
Iran expert now working as an analyst at Booz Allen Hamilton in
Washington. "They will hold a very hard line. They won't give anything
up, at least not upfront."
U.S. State Department spokesman Ian
Kelly told reporters Tuesday that the U.S. was waiting until Iran
submitted an official response to the proposal before weighing in. But
at least one American ally expressed impatience with Tehran.
"Iran
is wasting time because it is now that we need to talk. One day it will
be too late," French Foreign Minister Bernard Kouchner said on the
sidelines of a meeting with European counterparts in Luxembourg,
according to Agence France-Presse. "The Americans, through Mr. Obama's
determination, have injected fresh vigor into this need for dialogue,
but this will not last forever. Answers are needed."
According
to Al Alam, "Tehran will agree with the general framework of the
agreement on fuel for the Tehran research nuclear reactor, but it will
also stipulate important provisos," which its source did not specify.
On
Monday, Iranian Foreign Minister Manoucher Mottaki said Iran was
closely considering the deal, but may want to send less than the 2,650
pounds of enriched uranium it specifies, or purchase the enriched
uranium required for the Tehran reactor.
Al Alam's editor for
Iranian affairs, Nevid Behrouz, said Tehran's worries about the plan
centered on the quantity of uranium to be shipped abroad and concern
the West would not send the material back.
In addition to
angling for a better deal, Iranian officials lack confidence in the
West and the United Nations and even feel betrayed by Russia for
dragging its feet in providing fuel for a nuclear power plant in
Bushehr, Fowler said.
"They truly believe that if they're not
careful, they're going to step into some kind of trap. . . . They're
going to be literally cheated, embarrassed or backed into a corner," he
said.
Iran missed a Friday deadline to respond to the proposal
but gained important leverage this week when Russia, which holds U.N.
Security Council veto power, came to its defense and urged patience.
"In
this month alone concrete and potentially effective solutions have been
found," Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Sergei Rybakov said in an
interview published Monday, according to the Interfax news agency. "It
can't be ruled out that the process won't continue with the same
intensity. But everyone should arm themselves with as much patience as
possible."
He added, "By and large, Iran is showing readiness for cooperation with
both the IAEA and others."
U.S.
conservatives, such as Bush administration veteran John R. Bolton, have
criticized the Obama administration for endorsing the deal, saying
doing so legitimized Iran's continued enrichment of uranium in
violation of the Security Council.
Behrouz agreed. "By accepting
this draft," the analyst said, "the West has annulled the previous U.N.
Security Council decisions on halting enrichment."
Copyright
2009 Los Angeles Times