Georgia and Russia both hail report on war
As
the two nations scramble for the moral high ground, a report says
Georgia's attack on South Ossetia sparked the fighting, but that Russia
went 'far beyond ... reasonable limits.'
By Megan K. Stack
October 1, 2009
Reporting from Moscow
Georgia's
artillery barrage against the breakaway republic of South Ossetia
sparked last year's brief but bloody war with Russia, according to a
long-anticipated investigation whose findings were released Wednesday.
But the independent report commissioned by the European Union also
blames Russia for provoking the conflict and escalating the fighting
beyond "the reasonable limits."
"There is no way to assign overall responsibility for the conflict to
one side alone," the report concludes.
Months of exhaustive investigation appear to have done little to change
the general understanding of the chain of events, and the findings
leave a public relations battle for the higher moral ground largely
unresolved. Both Russia and Georgia crowed that the report backed up
their own narratives of the conflict.
The Kremlin was quick to
hail the finding that Georgia's attack "marked the beginning" of the
war. "We can only welcome this conclusion," a spokeswoman said.
The Georgian government said the EU investigation concluded "that
Russia invaded Georgia; Georgia never attacked Russia or any other
country."
"The report confirms that Russia committed an act of aggression against
a sovereign state," it said in a statement.
The bitterly debated question of who started the war has loomed over
the region for a year.
The Georgian government said it attacked South Ossetia in response to
an onslaught of Russian forces.
Moscow,
which had peacekeepers based in the separatist republic, said
additional troops were sent to South Ossetia and then deep into Georgia
to defend against a Georgian operation already underway.
The EU
report is carefully couched, saying that the Georgian shelling of the
South Ossetian capital, Tskhinvali, on Aug. 7, 2008, started the
fighting and could not be justified under international law. But the
report also criticizes Russia for meddling in Georgia's affairs and
waging a war that "went far beyond the reasonable limits of defense."
"Any explanation of the origins of the conflict cannot focus solely on
the artillery attack on Tskhinvali," says the report, written by Swiss
diplomat Heidi Tagliavini. "It must take into account years of
provocation, mutual accusations, military and political threats and
acts of violence."
'It's still going on'
The war lasted just five days. But the fighting over the war -- over
who was right and who was wrong, who was the victim and who the
aggressor -- lingers, feeding distrust between Moscow and the West and
deepening tensions over geopolitical identity in the former Soviet
Union.
"It's 100% important who started the war. It's the main
issue of every war," said Sergei Markov, a Russian lawmaker seen as
being close to the Kremlin.
"This report says very clearly that
[Georgian President Mikheil] Saakashvili is the aggressor and Ossetians
are the victims. This is the most important thing."
But other observers took a more nuanced stand.
"The problem is, the war was not a five-day war," said political
analyst Andrei Piontkovsky. "It did not begin on Aug. 7 and it did not
end on Aug. 12. The preparation for war had gone on for several years,
and in some sense it's still going on."
The most commonly accepted version of events has varied little since
the war erupted.
Russia
meddled for years, supporting separatists in South Ossetia and
Georgia's other breakaway republic, Abkhazia; distributing passports
and pension payments to residents of the rebel regions; using the
separatists as a countermove to U.S. support for Saakashvili and for
the independence of Kosovo.
Skirmishes flared throughout the
summer of 2008. And then, in the dead of night, Saakashvili launched a
military operation into South Ossetia. Russian tanks and warplanes
poured over the border, and the war had begun.
Russian escalation
The EU report does not confirm Georgian claims of a massive Russian
troop influx before Georgia attacked. However, it does give weight to
reports that Russia had been arming and training separatists and had
allowed mercenaries to cross into Georgia in the days before the war.
The
report also notes that extra Russian soldiers were on hand in South
Ossetia at the outbreak of the war, and that Russian bombardment began
earlier than Moscow said.
Russia is also criticized for its
allegations that Georgia was carrying out a genocide against South
Ossetians; for failing to honor Georgia's cease-fire; and for failing
to stop South Ossetian militiamen from looting, burning and raping
their way through ethnic Georgian villages, though it notes that forces
on all sides violated humanitarian and human rights laws.
Mostly,
the report blames Russia for serious escalation of the conflict. Its
tanks plunged far into Georgia, slicing the country in two and stopping
just 30 miles short of the capital.
About 850 people were
killed in the war, which crushed Georgia's military and left tens of
thousands of displaced Georgians still unable to go home.
"I
don't know what a proportionate response is in this kind of situation,"
Dmitry Rogozin, Russia's envoy to the North Atlantic Treaty
Organization, told reporters this week.
"When you have acid
splashed on your face and you put on brass knuckles and give the
attacker a good punch, is that proportionate or disproportionate?"
Since the war, South Ossetia and Abkhazia have declared their
independence, and been recognized by Russia, Nicaragua and Venezuela.
But the republics had no right to secede from Georgia, the report
concludes, and recognition of their independence is a violation of
international law.
The South Ossetians remained defiant Wednesday.
"Saakashvili
is a war criminal and it is time for the world to stop rewarding him,"
South Ossetian President Eduard Kokoity said in a statement. "There is
no going back. South Ossetia is an independent nation and will never
again be part of Georgia."
Copyright 2009 Los Angeles Times